Internal Navigation

Home

Arizona Law Page 2

Arizona Law Page 3

Arizona Law Page 4

Arizona Law Page 5

Arizona Law Page 6

Arizona Law Page 7

Arizona Law Page 8

Arizona Law Page 9

Arizona Law Page 10

Arizona Law Page 11

Arizona Law Page 12

Arizona Law Page 13

Arizona Law Page 14

Arizona Law Page 15

Arizona Law Page 16

Arizona Law Page 17

Arizona Law Page 18

Arizona Law Page 19

Arizona Law Page 20

Arizona Law Page 21

Arizona Law Page 22

Arizona Law Page 23

Arizona Law Page 24

Arizona Law Page 25

Arizona Law Page 26

Arizona Law Page 27

Arizona Law Page 28

Arizona Law Page 29

Arizona Law Page 30

External Links

Legal Information Institute

Martindale

Findlaw

LawInfo

Lawyers.com

Blogs

Phoenix Arizona Legal Blog

Law Blog

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

A.R.S. 25-411

Modification of custody decree; affidavit; contents

A. A person shall not make a motion to modify a custody decree earlier than one year after its date, unless the court permits it to be made on the basis of affidavits that there is reason to believe the child's present environment may seriously endanger the child's physical, mental, moral or emotional health. At any time after a joint custody order is entered, a parent may petition the court for modification of the order on the basis of evidence that domestic violence involving a violation of section 13-1201 or 13-1204, spousal abuse or child abuse occurred since the entry of the joint custody order. Six months after a joint custody order is entered, a parent may petition the court for modification of the order based on the failure of the other parent to comply with the provisions of the order. A motion or petition to modify a custody order shall meet the requirements of this section. Except as otherwise provided in subsection B of this section, if a custodial parent is a member of the United States armed forces, the court shall consider the terms of that parent's military family care plan to determine what is in the child's best interest during the custodial parent's military deployment.

B. For the purposes of a motion to modify a custody decree, the military deployment of a custodial parent who is a member of the United States armed forces is not a change in circumstances that materially affects the welfare of the child if the custodial parent has filed a military family care plan with the court at a previous custody proceeding and if the military deployment is less than six months.

C. A custody decree or order that a court enters in contemplation of or during the military deployment of a custodial parent outside of the continental United States shall specifically reference the deployment and include provisions governing the custody of the minor child after the deployment ends. Either parent may file a petition with the court after the deployment ends to modify the decree or order, in compliance with subsection F of this section. The court shall hold a hearing or conference on the petition within thirty days after the petition is filed.

D. The court may modify an order granting or denying parenting time rights whenever modification would serve the best interest of the child, but the court shall not restrict a parent's parenting time rights unless it finds that the parenting time would endanger seriously the child's physical, mental, moral or emotional health.

E. If after a custody or parenting time order is in effect one of the parents is charged with a dangerous crime against children as defined in section 13-705, child molestation as defined in section 13-1410 or an act of domestic violence as prescribed in section 13-3601 in which the victim is a minor, the other parent may petition the court for an expedited hearing. Pending the expedited hearing, the court may suspend parenting time or change custody ex parte.

F. To modify any type of custody order a person shall submit an affidavit or verified petition setting forth detailed facts supporting the requested modification and shall give notice, together with a copy of the affidavit or verified petition, to other parties to the proceeding, who may file opposing affidavits. The court shall deny the motion unless it finds that adequate cause for hearing the motion is established by the pleadings, in which case it shall set a date for hearing on why the requested modification should not be granted.

G. The court shall assess attorney fees and costs against a party seeking modification if the court finds that the modification action is vexatious and constitutes harassment.

H. Subsection F of this section does not apply if the requested relief is for the modification or clarification of visitation and not for a change of joint custody, joint legal custody, joint physical custody or sole custody.

Explanation: Normally if a custody order has been set by the family law court, a parent cannot seek to change it for a year. However, if you can prove that there is some danger or problems to the child, you can seek to do this. Also if there is joint custody, one parent can seek to modify it 6 months later, if they assert the other parent is not following the requirements. The remainder of the statute provides some procedures and requirements.

Phoenix Negligence Lawyers, Arizona Personal Injury

Phoenix Robbery and Theft Defense Lawyers

Accidentes en Sitios de Construccion Abogado Phoenix

A.R.S. 25-414

Violation of visitation or parenting time rights; penalties

A. If the court, based on a verified petition and after it gives reasonable notice to an alleged violating parent and an opportunity for that person to be heard, finds that a parent has refused without good cause to comply with a visitation or parenting time order, the court shall do at least one of the following:

1. Find the violating parent in contempt of court.

2. Order visitation or parenting time to make up for the missed sessions.

3. Order parent education at the violating parent's expense.

4. Order family counseling at the violating parent's expense.

5. Order civil penalties of not to exceed one hundred dollars for each violation. The court shall transmit monies collected pursuant to this paragraph each month to the county treasurer. The county treasurer shall transmit these monies monthly to the state treasurer for deposit into the alternative dispute resolution fund established by section 12-135.

6. Order both parents to participate in mediation or some other appropriate form of alternative dispute resolution at the violating parent's expense.

7. Make any other order that may promote the best interests of the child or children involved.

B. Within twenty-five days of service of the petition the court shall hold a hearing or conference before a judge, commissioner or person appointed by the court to review noncompliance with a visitation or parenting time order.

C. Court costs and attorney fees incurred by the nonviolating parent associated with the review of noncompliance with a visitation or parenting time order shall be paid by the violating parent. In the event the custodial parent prevails, the court in its discretion may award court costs and attorney fees to the custodial parent.

Explanation: If one parent is not complying with the parenting time requirements in custody agreements, the family law court has the ability to punish the offending parent. They can hold the parent in "contempt of court", order compliance with the agreement, mandate counseling and education (at the parent's expense).

Phoenix Arizona DUI Attorneys

Arizona DUI Lawyer Phoenix

A.R.S. 25-415

Custody by nonparent; presumption; grounds; definitions

A. A child custody proceeding may also be commenced in the superior court by a person other than a legal parent by filing a verified petition, or by a petition supported by an affidavit, in the county in which the child is permanently resident or is found. The petition shall include detailed facts supporting the petitioner's right to file the petition. The petitioner shall provide notice as required by subsection E. Notice shall include a copy of the petition and any affidavits. The court shall summarily deny a petition unless it finds that the petitioner by the pleadings established that all of the following are true:

1. The person filing the petition stands in loco parentis to the child.

2. It would be significantly detrimental to the child to remain or be placed in the custody of either of the child's living legal parents who wish to retain or obtain custody.

3. A court of competent jurisdiction has not entered or approved an order concerning the child's custody within one year before the person filed a petition pursuant to this section, unless there is reason to believe the child's present environment may seriously endanger the child's physical, mental, moral or emotional health.

4. One of the following applies:

(a) One of the legal parents is deceased.

(b) The child's legal parents are not married to each other at the time the petition is filed.

(c) There is a pending proceeding for dissolution of marriage or for legal separation of the legal parents at the time the petition is filed.

B. If a person other than a child's legal parent is seeking custody there is a rebuttable presumption that it is in the child's best interest to award custody to a legal parent because of the physical, psychological and emotional needs of the child to be reared by the child's legal parent. To rebut this presumption that person must show by clear and convincing evidence that awarding custody to a legal parent is not in the child's best interests.

C. The superior court may grant a person who stands in loco parentis to a child, including grandparents and great-grandparents, who meet the requirements of section 25-409 reasonable visitation rights to the child on a finding that the visitation is in the child's best interests and that any of the following is true:

1. One of the legal parents is deceased or has been missing at least three months.

2. The child's legal parents are not married to each other at the time the petition is filed.

3. There is a pending proceeding for dissolution of marriage or for legal separation of the legal parents at the time the petition is filed.

D. A grandparent, a great-grandparent or a person who stands in loco parentis to a child may bring a proceeding for visitation rights with a child by filing a verified petition in the county in which the child is permanently resident or is found.

E. Notice of a custody or visitation proceeding filed pursuant to this section shall be served pursuant to the rules of civil procedure to all of the following:

1. The child's parents.

2. A person who has court ordered custody or visitation rights.

3. The child's guardian or guardian ad litem.

4. A person or agency that has physical custody of the child or that claims to have custody or visitation rights.

5. Any other person or agency that has previously appeared in the action.

F. A person shall file proceedings for custody or visitation under this chapter in the same action in which the legal parents had their marriage dissolved or any other proceeding in which a previous custody order has been entered regarding the child.

G. For the purposes of this chapter:

1. "In loco parentis" means a person who has been treated as a parent by the child and who has formed a meaningful parental relationship with the child for a substantial period of time.

2. "Legal parent" means a biological or adoptive parent whose parental rights have not been terminated.

Explanation: Someone who is not a parent of a child under the law (meaning it's not your physical or adoptive child) can actually seek a custody hearing. There are serious considerations for the court here, as this person must show that it is in the child's best interest, and certain factors must exist.

Phoenix Arizona Bankruptcy Attorney

Phoenix Auto Accident Attorneys

Phoenix Injury and Accident Lawyers

A.R.S. 25-500

Definitions

In this chapter, unless the context otherwise requires:

1. "Arrearage" means the total unpaid support owed, including child support, past support, spousal maintenance and interest.

2. "Business day" means a day when state offices are open for regular business.

3. "Child support guidelines" means the child support guidelines that are adopted by the state supreme court.

4. "Child support subpoena" means a subpoena issued pursuant to section 25-520.

5. "Department" means the department of economic security.

6. "Income" means any form of payment owed to an individual, regardless of source, including wages, salaries, commissions, bonuses, workers' compensation, disability payments, payments pursuant to a pension or retirement program and interest.

7. "Obligee" means a person or agency entitled to receive support.

8. "Obligor" means a person obligated to pay support.

9. "Support" means the provision of maintenance or subsistence and includes medical insurance coverage, or cash medical support, and uncovered medical costs for the child, arrearages, interest on arrearages, past support, interest on past support and reimbursement for expended public assistance. In a title IV-D case, support includes spousal maintenance that is included in the same order that directs child support.

10. "Support payment clearinghouse" means the clearinghouse established pursuant to section 46-441.

11. "Title IV-D" means title IV-D of the social security act.

Explanation: Read this definitions to understand these terms that will come up in the statutes we analyze from the next chapter (chapter 5)

Phoenix lesion abogado

Phoenix Arizona accidente abogado

Phoenix Divorce Attorney and Lawyers

Phoenix Driver’s License Attorney, Arizona Driver’s License Lawyer